keronreading.blogg.se

1. #Windows 7 x64 drivers for samsung xp941 ssd pro
2. #Windows 7 x64 drivers for samsung xp941 ssd series

Our final consumer synthetic benchmarks compare the drives in a series of mixed server workloads with a queue depth from 1 to 128. In our aligned write activity, the results were mirrored (with the 845DC EVO taking first place), though the discrepancy began at the 4QD this time around.

#Windows 7 x64 drivers for samsung xp941 ssd pro

In the aligned write setting, the 850 PRO 128GB performed neck and neck with the XP94 up until the 16QD however, the XP941 ended up at the bottom by 64QD. In our next 4K test, we move to a workload with 100% read activity, which scales from 1QD to 64QD. When looking at max latency, the 850 Pro (0.19ms) and 845DC EVO (0.22ms) were the clear winners here the XP941 SSD reached 9.10ms. When comparing write latency, the XP941 and 850 Pro Samsung drives posted nearly identical results in average latency, with 0.0392ms and 0.0393ms respectively, while the 845DC EVO had 0.0445ms. In throughput, the SSD 850 PRO showed the best read activity scoring 7,394.09 IOPS while the best write activity came from the XP941 with 25,204.61 IOPS. The XP941 and 845 EVO Samsung drives posted read and write results of 24.41MB/s / 98.46MB/s and 23.48MB/s / 87.08MB/s respectively. In IOMeter’s random 4K read and write test the SSD 850 PRO had the best read and write scores with 28.88MB/s read and 98.40MB/s write. The Samsung XP941 boasted 1,415.18MB/s read and 1,399.98MB/s write in this benchmark. Moving to our 2MB random transfer performance tests, the 850 PRO and 845DC EVO has very similar results, with the former barely taking first place with 1,582.23MB/s read and 1,597.11MB/s write, while the 845DC EVO posted 1,550.54MB/s read and 1,593.17MB/s write. The Samsung 845DC Evo also performed very well with read and write speeds of 1,781.71MB/s and 1,582.10MB/s. The top performer in read speeds was the Samsung XP941 with a blistering 1,863.11MB/s while the Samsung SSD 850 PRO posted the best write activity with 1,597.19MB/s. In our first test, we will measure the 2MB sequential performance of the Samsung drives.

In the mix of drives tested we considered the following products from Samsung, all class leaders in terms of performance and price:Īll consumer SSD benchmarks are conducted with the HP Z620 testing platform. We took the HP Z620 and Samsung's line of SSDs to get to the bottom of this question to determine which SSDs are best for intensive PC-based workloads. It's not always obvious though where to justify the expense when it comes to figuring out capacity vs performance vs form factor. NET (26) AR (25) In-vehicle (25) simulation (22) Measuring instrument (21) Visualization (21) Machine learning (machine learning) (20) UI (20) TO DEAL (19) Video / Video (18) JavaScript (18) Deep learning (17) Raspberry Pi (17) DNA (17) Metashape (17) Clinical (16) Psychology (16) modeling (16) EEG (16) Structural analysis (15) ROS (15) Stimulus presentation (15) Image processing (15) protocol (15) Education (15) 3D model (15) Arduino (15) SLAM (14) Information dissemination September issue (14) GIS (14) (I.e.There are many choices when buying flash to accelerate intensive desktop-oriented workloads like those for media and entertainment (M&E), oil and gas research, CAD and more. In the future, I think that high-speed SSD storage using M.2 slots will be a powerful option for those who value the speed of storage.Īnalysis tool (42) VR (41) SBC (35) Small SBC (35) Statistical analysis (34) Spectrum (33) instrumentation (32) 3D camera (31) RealSense (28) Robot arm (27) Depth camera (27) IoT (26). Measurement resultīoth CrystalDiskMark and ATTO have results that are equivalent to the specifications, and you can see that the speed of the SAMSUNG SM951 is outstanding among them. * All comparisons are based on OS clean installation + system drive with only drivers. * For comparison of the BIOS settings, all are set to the default except the Boot setting for comparison. SAMSUNG SM951 I prepared and compared the speed difference with each generation. Therefore, we have a reputation for high performance with currently available M.2 SSDs. In addition, the M.2 slot is now compatible with PCI-E Gen3, and it is now possible to expect the performance of M.2 SSD connection type SSDs to be brought out even further.

■ This is an article posted on June 2015, 9, so the content of the information may be out of date.Ī new chipset has been released for the 6th generation Core i series (Skylake), and PCI-E Gen3.0 is supported on the chipset side.